Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Type: Theses
Title: Analysis of longitudinal data in perinatal trials when the length of follow-up is informative
Author: Longstaff, Tessa
Issue Date: 2016
School/Discipline: School of Mathematical Sciences
Abstract: Background: Most commonly used statistical methods assume that the data consist of independent observations. Clustered data occur in many settings, such as longitudinal studies, where outcomes are repeatedly measured over time on each subject. Observations from the same subject are dependent and hence form a cluster. Two commonly used methods of analysis for clustered data are mixed models and generalised estimating equations (GEEs). Additional complexity arises when analysing clustered data where the cluster size is informative; that is, where the cluster size is related to the outcome. Most methods of analysis for clustered data, including mixed models and GEEs, generally assume non informative cluster size and hence may not be suitable when the cluster size is informative. Aim: The aim of this thesis is to compare methods for analysing longitudinal data when the cluster size (length of follow up) is informative. Methods: Both real and simulated data were used to compare methods for analysing clustered data with informative cluster size. A range of methods were considered including: GEEs with independent, autoregressive or exchangeable working correlation structures; cluster weighted GEEs; and mixed models. The real data come from a perinatal trial (the POPPET trial), which investigated the effect of high versus standard protein content human milk fortifier on the growth of 60 preterm infants. This dataset was used to investigate different methods of analysis for estimating the effect of treatment on infant growth when informative cluster size was suspected. As real data cannot be used to show which methods of analysis are performing best in general, a simulation study was conducted to compare methods when the true parameter values were known. The data were simulated based on the POPPET trial. Different treatment effects, sample sizes, and correlations between the cluster size and the outcomes were considered. Results: For the POPPET trial, evidence of informative cluster size was found. Different methods of analysis produced quite different parameter estimates but similar conclusions about the effect of the intervention. The simulation results showed that when cluster size was non informative, all methods performed very well. When cluster size was informative, mixed models and autoregressive GEEs always performed well. However, the independence, exchangeable and cluster weighted GEEs often produced low coverage probabilities and model based standard errors that differed from the standard deviation of the parameter estimates. These methods generally performed better when the trial size was larger and when there was no correlation between individual growth trajectories and cluster size. Conclusions: It is recommended that mixed models or autoregressive GEEs be used to analyse longitudinal data with informative cluster size in general, including the POPPET trial data. Independence, exchangeable and cluster weighted GEEs should only be used when the sample size is large and there is no correlation between individual growth trajectories and cluster size.
Advisor: Glonek, Garique Francis Vladimir
Yellend, Lisa
Dissertation Note: Thesis (M.Phil.) -- University of Adelaide, School of Mathematical Sciences, 2016.
Keywords: longitudinal data
perinatal trial
Provenance: This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at:
Appears in Collections:Research Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01front.pdf152.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02whole.pdf3.89 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
PermissionsLibrary staff access only303.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
RestrictedLibrary staff access only4.09 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.