Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/101187
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Alligators and crocodiles have high paracellular absorption of nutrients, but differ in digestive morphology and physiology
Author: Tracy, C.
McWhorter, T.
Gienger, C.
Starck, J.
Medley, P.
Manolis, S.
Webb, G.
Christian, K.
Citation: Integrative and Comparative Biology, 2015; 55(6):986-1004
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Issue Date: 2015
ISSN: 1540-7063
1557-7023
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Christopher R. Tracy, Todd J. McWhorter, C.M. Gienger, J. Matthias Starck, Peter Medley, S. Charlie Manolis, Grahame J.W. Webb, and Keith A. Christian
Abstract: Much of what is known about crocodilian nutrition and growth has come from animals propagated in captivity, but captive animals from the families Crocodilidae and Alligatoridae respond differently to similar diets. Since there are few comparative studies of crocodilian digestive physiology to help explain these differences, we investigated young Alligator mississippiensis and Crocodylus porosus in terms of (1) gross and microscopic morphology of the intestine, (2) activity of the membrane-bound digestive enzymes aminopeptidase-N, maltase, and sucrase, and (3) nutrient absorption by carrier-mediated and paracellular pathways. We also measured gut morphology of animals over a larger range of body sizes. The two species showed different allometry of length and mass of the gut, with A. mississippiensis having a steeper increase in intestinal mass with body size, and C. porosus having a steeper increase in intestinal length with body size. Both species showed similar patterns of magnification of the intestinal surface area, with decreasing magnification from the proximal to distal ends of the intestine. Although A. mississippiensis had significantly greater surface-area magnification overall, a compensating significant difference in gut length between species meant that total surface area of the intestine was not significantly different from that of C. porosus. The species differed in enzyme activities, with A. mississippiensis having significantly greater ability to digest carbohydrates relative to protein than did C. porosus. These differences in enzyme activity may help explain the differences in performance between the crocodilian families when on artificial diets. Both A. mississippiensis and C. porosus showed high absorption of 3-O methyl D-glucose (absorbed via both carrier-mediated and paracellular transport), as expected. Both species also showed surprisingly high levels of L-glucose-uptake (absorbed paracellularly), with fractional absorptions as high as those previously seen only in small birds and bats. Analyses of absorption rates suggested a relatively high proportional contribution of paracellular (i.e., non-mediated) uptake to total uptake of nutrients in both species. Because we measured juveniles, and most paracellular studies to date have been on adults, it is unclear whether high paracellular absorption is generally high within crocodilians or whether these high values are specific to juveniles.
Keywords: Animals
Alligators and Crocodiles
Species Specificity
Biological Transport
Digestion
Intestinal Absorption
Carbohydrate Metabolism
Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Rights: © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
DOI: 10.1093/icb/icv060
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP0882478
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icb/icv060
Appears in Collections:Animal and Veterinary Sciences publications
Aurora harvest 3

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.