Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Type: Thesis
Title: The challenges of implementing an integrated One Health surveillance system in Australia: A qualitative study
Author: Johnson, Isabella, G.R.L.
Issue Date: 2016
Abstract: Background: One Health is an interdisciplinary approach to zoonotic diseases, which encourages structured collaboration and coordination between human, animal and ecological sectors. This interdisciplinary approach could be applied to zoonotic disease surveillance in Australia. Addressing zoonoses at the interface of human, animal and environmental health is considered to be the most holistic approach to zoonotic disease control. Seventy five percent of emerging infectious diseases are of animal origin, so an approach that links the health of humans, animals and the environment could provide an earlier opportunity for disease detection and therefore may help to reduce the burden of zoonotic diseases. Currently in Australia, human, animal and environmental health are managed by separate sectors with limited communication, acting as a barrier to effective and timely zoonotic responses. This study aims to explore how professionals in the field of human, animal and ecological health perceive a One Health approach to zoonotic disease surveillance, aiming to identify what the challenges are to the implementation of an integrated surveillance system in Australia. Methods and results: Using a qualitative research method, ten semi-structured interviews were conducted with experts in the areas of human, animal and ecological health in order to gain an understanding of professional opinions regarding the challenges of implementing One Health surveillance in Australia. A thematic analysis of the data was undertaken to identify recurring themes. Findings showed that the absence of a clear definition of One Health acts as a barrier to collaboration, as well as siloed approaches by different sectors restricting the ability for professionals to work collaboratively across disciplines. Understanding disease transmission as a whole, as well as understanding the role of the environment on human and animal health were considered by participants to be vital requirements for a One Health approach to be successful. Additionally, political will was considered by participants to be an essential requirement for the integration of government systems. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that for a One Health approach to be implemented in an Australian setting, those working in the fields of human, animal and ecological health must come together to agree on a ‘One Health’ definition. Restructuring of the traditional silos, which currently restrict intersectoral collaboration, could result in an improved and collective approach to zoonotic disease surveillance. This could be achieved through the establishment of a formal governance body. Regular communication may provide an avenue for interdisciplinary approaches, and could assist in overcoming the longstanding barriers of privacy and distrust between sectors. Further, developing interdisciplinary public health training in medical, environmental and veterinary degrees may encourage cross-disciplinary collaboration. Finally, illustrating the economic benefit of faster zoonotic detection will likely attract the attention of politicians, who could assist in implementing a formal and structured One Health approach in Australia.
Advisor: Bi, Peng
Hansen, Alana L.
Dissertation Note: Thesis (BHlthSc(Hons)) -- University of Adelaide, School of Public Health, 2016
Keywords: One Health
thematic analysis
Provenance: This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at:
DOI: 10.4225/55/589bb3bb5c719
Appears in Collections:School of Public Health

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01front.pdf216.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02whole.pdf1.33 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
PermissionsLibrary staff access only716.3 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
RestrictedLibrary staff access only1.48 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.