Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Examining an Australian physical activity and nutrition intervention using RE-AIM|
|Citation:||Health Promotion International, 2016; 31(2):450-458|
|Publisher:||Oxford University Press|
|Cristina M. Caperchione, Mitch Duncan, Gregory S. Kolt, Corneel Vandelanotte, Richard R. Rosenkranz, Anthony Maeder, Manny Noakes, Mohan Karunanithi and W. Kerry Mummery|
|Abstract:||Translating evidence-based interventions into community practice is vital to health promotion. This study used the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the larger dissemination of the ManUp intervention, an intervention which utilized interactiveweb-based technologies to improve the physical activity and nutrition behaviors of residents in Central Queensland, Australia. Data were collected for each RE-AIM measure (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) using (i) computer-assisted telephone interview survey (N = 312) with adults (18 years and over) from Central Queensland, (ii) interviews with key stakeholders from local organizations (n = 12) and (iii) examination of project-related statistics and findings. In terms of Reach, 47% of participants were aware of the intervention; Effectiveness, there were no significant differences between physical activity and healthy nutrition levels in those aware and unaware; Adoption, 73 participants registered for the intervention and 25% of organizations adopted some part of the intervention; Implementation, 26% of participants initially logged onto the website, 29 and 17% started the web-based physical activity and nutrition challenges, 33% of organizations implemented the intervention, 42% considered implementation and 25% reported difficulties; Maintenance, an average of 0.57 logins and 1.35 entries per week during the 12 week dissemination and 0.27 logins and 0.63 entries per week during the 9-month follow-up were achieved, 22 and 0% of participants completed the web-based physical activity and nutrition challenges and 33.3% of organizations intended to continue utilizing components of the intervention. While this intervention demonstrated good reach, effectiveness, adoption and implementation warrant further investigation.|
|Keywords:||exercise; nutrition; process evaluation; community health promotion|
|Rights:||© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: email@example.com|
|Appears in Collections:||Medicine publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.