Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/108163
Type: Journal article
Title: If we build it, will they come? Saving the history tutorial and rethinking assessment
Author: Sendziuk, P.
Citation: History Australia, 2015; 12(3):192-206
Publisher: Monash University ePress
Issue Date: 2015
ISSN: 1833-4881
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Paul Sendziuk
Abstract: As teaching programs in university history departments strain under the pressure of increasing class sizes, diminished budgets and fewer staff, savings in time and money have been sought by reducing the number of tutorials offered to students. Charting the history of one university’s attempt to make cuts to the humanities tutorial program, this article critiques the arguments used to justify such measures, and mounts a defence of the tutorial system, although not of the way in which students have been traditionally assessed and taught. It argues that if tutorials are to be saved and they are to enliven student learning, teacher-historians need to rethink the way in which they assess students and organise their teaching activities.
Rights: © 2015 Taylor & Francis
RMID: 0030041327
Published version: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14490854.2015.11668594
Appears in Collections:History publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.