Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Student engagement and their perceptions of the effectiveness of different tutorial formats in the humanities|
|Citation:||The International Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 2014; 20(2):1-21|
|Publisher:||Common Ground Research|
|Abstract:||This paper describes four of the most common tutorial formats adopted in the humanities — large (entire class) discussions, small group discussions, role-plays, and internet-based threaded discussions — and examines student perceptions of their engagement with, and the effectiveness of, each format based on a range of criteria. The information was collected at the end of a semester-length course in which the students experienced each tutorial style on at least two occasions. Students then completed non-compulsory and anonymous questionnaires asking them to rank the tutorial formats against each other (from 1 to 4) according to eight different criteria, including which tutorial was the most enjoyable, which offered the greatest opportunity for meaningful contribution to the discussion, and which most motivated the student to prepare and participate. The responses pointed to an overwhelming preference for small group activities over large (entire class) discussions, and indicated dissatisfaction with online threaded discussions, which were rated last for the majority of criteria. The responses also revealed that students valued the opportunity to role-play, and that such activities motivated students to prepare most thoroughly for tutorial.|
|Keywords:||Student engagement; asynchronous online discussion; role-play|
|Rights:||Copyright Status Unknown|
|Appears in Collections:||History publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.