Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/113378
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorWilkinson, Kerry Leigh-
dc.contributor.advisorFord, Christopher Michael-
dc.contributor.advisorBurton, Rachel Anita-
dc.contributor.authorvan der Hulst, Lieke-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/113378-
dc.description.abstractSmoke taint is a fault found in wines made from grapes exposed to bushfire smoke. It is characterised by objectionable smoky and ashy aromas and flavours, which have been attributed to the presence of smoke derived volatile phenols, in free and glycoconjugate forms. Chapter 1 comprises a summary of the impact of bushfires on the wine industry and a review of previous smoke taint research, which includes many investigations into the composition of wine produced from smoke-affected fruit. Gaps of knowledge are identified in Chapter 1, and the issues addressed in this thesis are identified and summarised in the research aims. Chapter 2 describes a field trial that investigated the accumulation of smoke taint precursors in three Vitis vinifera cultivars, Sauvignon Blanc, Chardonnay and Merlot, at different time points, following grapevine exposure to smoke under experimental conditions. Varietal differences in volatile phenol glycoconjugate profiles were observed; interestingly, these profiles also differed between samples harvested 1 day after smoke exposure and samples harvested at maturity. An evaluation of the effect of an agrichemical applied to grapevine fruit and foliage as a physical barrier to prevent the uptake of smoke is also reported; together with the results of an investigation into the potential for reflectance spectroscopy, measured using a handheld spectrometer, to detect smoke-affected fruit. A subsequent field trial sought to further verify the use of a second agrichemical to mitigate the impacts of grapevine exposure to smoke; and reflectance spectroscopy to evaluate smoke exposure in the vineyard and is also included in Chapter 2. Whereas the glycosylation of smoke derived volatile phenols in grapevine fruit and leaves following exposure to smoke is reasonably well understood, the biochemical and molecular consequences of grapevine smoke exposure have received comparatively little consideration. The research described in Chapter 3 endeavours to address this knowledge gap through investigations into the expression of grapevine glycosyltransferases (GTs) following smoke exposure. Higher expression profiles of certain sets of genes (including heat shock proteins and putative GTs) were identified through RNA sequencing of two grape cultivars grown as potted grapevines in a growth room. Selected GT candidates were analysed in a subsequent field trial, in which Q-PCR expression analysis showed higher expression of two GT1 family genes at specific time points; with differential expression found to be highest in skin, rather than pulp, fractions following smoke exposure. To date, the occurrence of smoke taint has not been reported in crops other than grapes, despite the proximity of bushfires in regions comprising broader agricultural production. The final chapter of experimental work in this thesis, Chapter 4, describes analysis of a field trial involving the application of smoke to apple trees, to investigate whether or not apples can be similarly affected by smoke. Chapter 5 reflects on the experimental work described in this thesis, including a discussion towards challenges and future directions in the research of smoke taint.en
dc.subjectResearch by publicationen
dc.subjectsmoke tainten
dc.subjectgrapesen
dc.subjectwineen
dc.subjectgrapevinesen
dc.subjectsmokeen
dc.subjectglucosyltransferaseen
dc.subjectglycoconjugatesen
dc.subjectvolatile phenolsen
dc.titleThe analysis of grapevine response to smoke exposureen
dc.typeThesesen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wineen
dc.provenanceCopyright has been removed from this thesis. To enquire about access to the removed material please email library_theses@adelaide.edu.auen
dc.provenanceThis electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals-
dc.description.dissertationThesis (Ph.D.) (Research by Publication) -- University of Adelaide, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, 2018en
dc.identifier.doi10.25909/5b6b81e1742da-
Appears in Collections:Research Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01front.pdf866.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02whole.pdf4.69 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Permissions
  Restricted Access
Library staff access only779.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Restricted
  Restricted Access
Library staff access only5.28 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.