Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/114016
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShams, P.-
dc.contributor.authorPirbhai, A.-
dc.contributor.authorSelva, D.-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationEye, 2016; 30(4):621-626-
dc.identifier.issn0950-222X-
dc.identifier.issn1476-5454-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/114016-
dc.description.abstractTo prospectively evaluate the surgical outcomes of membranous and solid distal common canalicular obstructions (CCOs) following endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EnDCR) and lacrimal intubation combined with either membranotomy or trephination.This was a prospective, non-randomized, consecutive interventional case series. Inclusion criteria included patients undergoing EnDCR with evidence of a membranous block or more solid obstruction of the distal common canaliculus, treated with membranotomy or canalicular trephination. Complete CCO was confirmed pre-operatively using dacryocystography and dacryoscintigraphy. All patients received bicanalicular intubation for 3 months with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Functional and anatomical success was assessed at 4 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months following surgery. Functional success was defined as subjective improvement of epiphora and anatomical success as the presence of a patent ostium and a positive dye test on nasal endoscopy.Twenty-nine patients were included in the study with a mean age of 58 years. Twenty-one patients (72%) received a membranotomy and eight (28%) required trephination. At 12 months, the functional and anatomical success rate in the membranotomy group was 90% (19/21) and 100% (21/21), respectively, and in trephination group the functional and anatomical success rate was 63% (5/8). There were no intra-operative or lacrimal stent-related complications.Identifying and excising distal CCOs in association with EnDCR and lacrimal intubation is associated with a high degree of functional (83%) and anatomical (90%) success. The success of membranous obstructions appear be superior to outcomes for solid obstructions of the distal common canaliculus that require trephination.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityP. N. Shams, A. Pirbhai and D. Selva-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherNature Publishing Group-
dc.rights© 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.11-
dc.subjectMembranous obstructions-
dc.titleA prospective outcome study of membranous and solid distal common canalicular obstructions-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/eye.2016.11-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidSelva, D. [0000-0002-2169-5417]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Opthalmology & Visual Sciences publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.