Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/120632
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBailey, N.en
dc.contributor.authorHoy, K.en
dc.contributor.authorRogasch, N.en
dc.contributor.authorThomson, R.en
dc.contributor.authorMcQueen, S.en
dc.contributor.authorElliot, D.en
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, C.en
dc.contributor.authorFulcher, B.en
dc.contributor.authorDaskalakis, Z.en
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, P.en
dc.date.issued2019en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Affective Disorders, 2019; 242:68-79en
dc.identifier.issn0165-0327en
dc.identifier.issn1573-2517en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/120632-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND:Non-response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment for depression is costly for both patients and clinics. Simple and cheap methods to predict response would reduce this burden. Resting EEG measures differentiate responders from non-responders, so may have utility for response prediction. METHODS:Fifty patients with treatment resistant depression and 21 controls had resting electroencephalography (EEG) recorded at baseline (BL). Patients underwent 5-8 weeks of rTMS treatment, with EEG recordings repeated at week 1 (W1). Forty-two participants had valid BL and W1 EEG data, and 12 were responders. Responders and non-responders were compared at BL and W1 in measures of theta (4-8 Hz) and alpha (8-13 Hz) power and connectivity, frontal theta cordance and alpha peak frequency. Control group comparisons were made for measures that differed between responders and non-responders. A machine learning algorithm assessed the potential to differentiate responders from non-responders using EEG measures in combination with change in depression scores from BL to W1. RESULTS:Responders showed elevated theta connectivity across BL and W1. No other EEG measures differed between groups. Responders could be distinguished from non-responders with a mean sensitivity of 0.84 (p = 0.001) and specificity of 0.89 (p = 0.002) using cross-validated machine learning classification on the combination of all EEG and mood measures. LIMITATIONS:The low response rate limited our sample size to only 12 responders. CONCLUSION:Resting theta connectivity at BL and W1 differ between responders and non-responders, and show potential for predicting response to rTMS treatment for depression.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityN.W. Bailey, K.E. Hoy, N.C. Rogasch, R.H. Thomson, S. McQueen, D. Elliot, C.M. Sullivan, B.D. Fulcher, Z.J. Daskalakis, P.B. Fitzgeralden
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.rightsCrown Copyright © 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.subjectTranscranial magnetic stimulation; treatment resistant depression; electroencephalography; theta; alphaen
dc.titleDifferentiating responders and non-responders to rTMS treatment for depression after one week using resting EEG connectivity measuresen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030120383en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.058en
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1082894en
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1072057en
dc.identifier.pubid478624-
pubs.library.collectionMedia Studies publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS10en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidRogasch, N. [0000-0002-4484-1069]en
Appears in Collections:Media Studies publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.