Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/123286
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Gift giving and corruption |
Author: | Graycar, A. Jancsics, D. |
Citation: | International Journal of Public Administration, 2017; 40(12):1013-1023 |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
Issue Date: | 2017 |
ISSN: | 0190-0692 1532-4265 |
Statement of Responsibility: | Adam Graycar and David Jancsics |
Abstract: | When individuals exchange gifts, social bonds are strengthened and reciprocity is created. If the gift and the reciprocation both come from private resources, it is clearly a gift. If what is reciprocated after a gift is given comes from an organization, or is a government resource rather than from “one’s own pocket” then it is most likely a bribe. This study reviews the anthropological literature on gift giving and constructs a typology for examining the gift/bribe distinction in public administration. This classification helps distinguish analytically among different gift practices and clarify conceptual ambiguity of the terms gift and bribe. |
Keywords: | Anthropology; corruption; gift giving; public administration |
Rights: | © 2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC |
DOI: | 10.1080/01900692.2016.1177833 |
Published version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1177833 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 4 Politics publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.