Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/123286
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGraycar, A.-
dc.contributor.authorJancsics, D.-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Public Administration, 2017; 40(12):1013-1023-
dc.identifier.issn0190-0692-
dc.identifier.issn1532-4265-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/123286-
dc.description.abstractWhen individuals exchange gifts, social bonds are strengthened and reciprocity is created. If the gift and the reciprocation both come from private resources, it is clearly a gift. If what is reciprocated after a gift is given comes from an organization, or is a government resource rather than from “one’s own pocket” then it is most likely a bribe. This study reviews the anthropological literature on gift giving and constructs a typology for examining the gift/bribe distinction in public administration. This classification helps distinguish analytically among different gift practices and clarify conceptual ambiguity of the terms gift and bribe.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAdam Graycar and David Jancsics-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis-
dc.rights© 2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1177833-
dc.subjectAnthropology; corruption; gift giving; public administration-
dc.titleGift giving and corruption-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01900692.2016.1177833-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidGraycar, A. [0000-0003-2649-2229]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Politics publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.