Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/126216
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchubert, B.-
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, W.-
dc.contributor.authorCazzolato, B.-
dc.contributor.authorGhayesh, M.-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationOcean Engineering, 2020; 197:106828-1-106828-12-
dc.identifier.issn0029-8018-
dc.identifier.issn1873-5258-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/126216-
dc.descriptionAvailable online 18 December 2019-
dc.description.abstractThis study compares the response of a submerged CETO-shaped point absorber wave energy converter using linear, partially-nonlinear, pseudo-nonlinear, and fully-nonlinear methods to model hydrodynamic effects. Linear potential flow models calculate hydrodynamic parameters to represent the fluid-structure interaction; typical dynamic models apply these parameters without pose-dependence. The partially-nonlinear method evaluates excitation forces at different poses to introduce a pose-dependent excitation force; in addition to the excitation force, the pseudo-nonlinear method calculates hydrodynamic coefficients using linear potential flow methods and includes pose-dependence through interpolating pre-calculated parameters to represent the radiation force. The fully-nonlinear CFD model is a numerical wave tank validated against published data. The applicability of linear-based methods has been explored by comparing the motion, force, and power of the system under various operating conditions against the fully-nonlinear results. It was expected that for low amplitude waves results tend towards the linear results; however, for both low amplitude waves and increased submergence depth, linear methods provided poor representations of the nonlinear CFD results. Geometric nonlinearities were insufficient to capture all the nonlinear behaviour. A frequency-dependent nonlinearity was identified in the water above the buoy resonating. For such submerged point absorbers, linear methods do not adequately represent the influential nonlinear effects.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityBenjamin W. Schubert, William S.P. Robertson, Benjamin S. Cazzolato, Mergen H. Ghayesh-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.rights© 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106828-
dc.subjectWave energy converter; Submerged point absorber; Fully and partially nonlinear hydrodynamics; Numerical wave tank-
dc.titleLinear and nonlinear hydrodynamic models for dynamics of a submerged point absorber wave energy converter-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106828-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidSchubert, B. [0000-0003-2008-8065]-
dc.identifier.orcidRobertson, W. [0000-0001-7351-8378]-
dc.identifier.orcidCazzolato, B. [0000-0003-2308-799X]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Mechanical Engineering publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_126216.pdfAccepted version6.54 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.