Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/128530
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Heart rate acceleration at relative workloads during treadmill and overground running for tracking exercise performance during functional overreaching
Author: Bellenger, C.R.
Thomson, R.L.
Robertson, E.Y.
Davison, K.
Nelson, M.J.
Karavirta, L.
Buckley, J.D.
Citation: Scientific Reports, 2020; 10(1):14622-14622
Publisher: Nature
Issue Date: 2020
ISSN: 2045-2322
2045-2322
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Clint R. Bellenger, Rebecca L. Thomson, Eileen Y. Robertson, Kade Davison, Maximillian J. N elson, Laura Karavirta, Jonathan D. Buckley
Abstract: Maximal rate of heart rate (HR) increase (rHRI) as a measure of HR acceleration during the transition from rest to exercise, or during an increase in workload, tracks exercise performance. rHRI assessed at relative rather than absolute workloads may track performance better, and a field test would increase applicability. This study therefore aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of rHRI assessed at individualised relative workloads during treadmill and overground running for tracking exercise performance. Treadmill running performance (5 km time trial; 5TTT) and rHRI were assessed in 11 male runners following 1 week of light training (LT), 2 weeks of heavy training (HT) and a 10-day taper (T). rHRI was the first derivative maximum of a sigmoidal curve fit to HR data collected during 5 min of treadmill running at 65% peak HR (rHRI65%), and subsequent transition to 85% peak HR (rHRI85%). Participants ran at the same speeds overground, paced by a foot-mounted accelerometer. Time to complete 5TTT likely increased following HT (ES = 0.14 ± 0.03), and almost certainly decreased following T (ES = - 0.30 ± 0.07). Treadmill and field rHRI65% likely increased after HT in comparison to LT (ES ≤ 0.48 ± 0.32), and was unchanged at T. Treadmill and field rHRI85% was unchanged at HT in comparison to LT, and likely decreased at T in comparison to LT (ES ≤ - 0.55 ± 0.50). 5TTT was not correlated with treadmill or field rHRI65% or rHRI85%. rHRI65% was highly correlated between treadmill and field tests across LT, HT and T (r ≥ 0.63), but correlations for rHRI85% were trivial to moderate (r ≤ 0.42). rHRI assessed at relative exercise intensities does not track performance. rHRI assessed during the transition from rest to running overground and on a treadmill at the same running speed were highly correlated, suggesting that rHRI can be validly assessed under field conditions at 65% of peak HR.
Keywords: Humans
Exercise Test
Heart Rate
Exercise Tolerance
Running
Adult
Middle Aged
Workload
Male
Athletic Performance
Rights: © The Author(s) 2020. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creat iveco mmons .org/licen ses/by/4.0/.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71597-4
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP140101013
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71597-4
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.