Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Type: Journal article
Title: What leads to variations in the results of life-cycle energy assessment? An evidence-based framework for residential buildings
Author: Omrany, H.
Soebarto, V.
Zuo, J.
Sharifi, E.
Chang, R.
Citation: Energy and Built Environment, 2021; 2(4):392-405
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Issue Date: 2021
ISSN: 2666-1233
Statement of
Hossein Omrany, Veronica Soebarto, Jian Zuo, Ehsan Sharifi, Ruidong Chang
Abstract: Residential buildings are one of the major contributors to climate change due to their significant impacts on global energy consumption. Hence, most countries have introduced regulations to minimize energy use in residential buildings. To date, the focus of these regulations has mainly been on operational energy while excluding embodied energy. In recent years, extensive studies have highlighted the necessity of minimizing both embodied energy and operational energy by applying the life-cycle energy assessment (LCEA) approach. However, the absence of a standardized framework and calculation methodology for the analysis of embodied energy has reportedly led to variations in the LCEA results. Retrospective research endeavoured to explore the causes of variations, with a limited focus on calculating embodied impacts. Despite the undertaken attempts, there is still a need to investigate the key parameters causing variations in LCEA results by examining methodological approaches of the current studies toward quantifications of embodied and operational energies. This paper aims to address three primary questions: ‘what is the current trend of methodological approach for applying LCEA in residential buildings?’; ‘what are the key parameters causing variations in LCEA results?’; and ‘how can the continued variations in the application of LCEA in residential buildings be overcome?’. To this end, 40 LCEA studies representing 157 cases of residential buildings across 16 countries have been critically reviewed. The findings reveal four principal categories of parameters that potentially contribute to the varying results of LCEAs: system boundary definition, calculation methods, geographical context, and interpretation of results. This paper also proposes a conceptual framework to minimize variations in LCEA studies by standardizing the process of conducting LCEAs.
Keywords: Life cycle energy assessment; Life cycle assessment; Residential buildings; Energy efficiency; Embodied energy; Operational energy
Description: Available online 23 September 2020
Rights: © 2020 Southwest Jiatong University. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communication Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( )
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbenv.2020.09.005
Appears in Collections:Architecture publications
Aurora harvest 8

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_130276.pdfPublished version1.37 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.