Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/134418
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChakraborty, A.-
dc.contributor.authorOguoma, V.M.-
dc.contributor.authorCoffee, N.T.-
dc.contributor.authorMarkey, P.-
dc.contributor.authorChong, A.-
dc.contributor.authorCargo, M.-
dc.contributor.authorDaniel, M.-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationHealthcare, 2022; 10(1):173-173-
dc.identifier.issn2227-9032-
dc.identifier.issn2227-9032-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2440/134418-
dc.description.abstractThe health of Indigenous Australians is far poorer than non-Indigenous Australians, including an excess burden of infectious diseases. The health effect of built environmental (BE) features on Indigenous communities receives little attention. This study's objective was to determine associations between BE features and infectious disease incidence rates in remote Indigenous communities in the Northern Territory (NT), Australia. Remote Indigenous communities (n = 110) were spatially joined to 93 Indigenous Locations (ILOC). Outcomes data were extracted (NT Notifiable Diseases System) and expressed as ILOC-specific incidence rates. Counts of buildings were extracted from community asset maps and grouped by function. Age-adjusted infectious disease rates were dichotomised, and bivariate binomial regression used to determine the relationships between BE variables and infectious disease. Infrastructure Shelter BE features were universally associated with significantly elevated disease outcomes (relative risk 1.67 to 2.03). Significant associations were observed for Services, Arena, Community, Childcare, Oval, and Sports and recreation BE features. BE groupings associated with disease outcomes were those with communal and/or social design intent or use. Comparable BE groupings without this intent or use did not associate with disease outcomes. While discouraging use of communal BE features during infectious disease outbreaks is a conceptually valid countermeasure, communal activities have additional health benefits themselves, and infectious disease transmission could instead be reduced through repairs to infrastructure, and more infrastructure. This is the first study to examine these associations simultaneously in more than a handful of remote Indigenous communities to illustrate community-level rather than aggregated population-level associations.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAmal Chakraborty, Victor Maduabuchi Oguoma, Neil T. Coffee, Peter Markey, Alwin Chong, Margaret Cargo and Mark Daniel-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherMDPI AG-
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10010173-
dc.subjectbuilt environment-
dc.subjectcommunicable diseases-
dc.subjectcommunity infrastructure-
dc.subjectdisease outbreaks-
dc.subjectindigenous-
dc.subjectinfectious diseases-
dc.subjectpublic health-
dc.subjectremote community-
dc.subjectspatial epidemiology-
dc.titleAssociation of built environmental features with rates of infectious diseases in remote indigenous communities in the Northern Territory, Australia-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/healthcare10010173-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1051824-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidCoffee, N.T. [0000-0002-5075-0737]-
Appears in Collections:Architecture publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_134418.pdfpublished version262.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.