Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Housing inequality: a systematic scoping review|
|Citation:||Housing Studies, 2022|
|Publisher:||Taylor & Francis (Routledge)|
|Laura James, Lyrian Daniel, Rebecca Bentley, Emma Baker|
|Abstract:||Housing inequality is far more than a housing matter. To discover how housing inequality has been used across disciplines, and how this may inform future housing research, we performed a systematic scoping review. We found that housing inequality provides multiple understandings as well as a variety of uses, for example, as a measurement tool, a conceptual device, or as subject matter. To draw together useful lessons from this conceptually diverse body of work, we identify four principle uses of ‘housing inequality’ in the literature – an outcome, an experience, a product, and a construct. These four framings offer a level of conceptual clarity for thinking about, and researching, the different expressions of housing inequality. It contributes to housing research by providing an approach for taking into account the multiple and complex roles of housing, and its distribution and impacts across society.|
|Keywords:||Housing inequality; systematic review|
|Description:||Published online: 12 Sep 2022. OnlinePubl|
|Rights:||© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group|
|Appears in Collections:||Architecture publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.