Adelaide Research & Scholarship
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/14131
| Citations | ||
| Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
|---|---|---|
|
?
|
?
|
|
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Smith, J. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Smith, C. | - |
| dc.date.issued | 1996 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Population and Environment, 1996; 17(4):309-321 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0199-0039 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1573-7810 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/14131 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The second law of thermodynamics has played an important role in ecological economics as providing a justification for the view that economies have limits to growth. Yet beyond basic textbooks statements of this law, we seldom find informed philosophical examinations of the meaning and metaphysical justification for the second law. In this paper we shall examine some challenges which have been made to the limits to growth (Limitationist) position by those criticizing the scope and application of the second law of thermodynamics and we shall in turn defend Limitationism against these criticisms. © 1996 Human Sciences Press, Inc. | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC | - |
| dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02208231 | - |
| dc.title | Economics, ecology and entropy: the second law of thermodynamics and the limits to growth | - |
| dc.type | Journal article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/BF02208231 | - |
| pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 7 Geography, Environment and Population publications | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.