1. Adelaide Research & Scholarship
  2. Schools and Disciplines
  3. School of Humanities
  4. Philosophy
  5. Philosophy publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/16138
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMortensen, C.-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationLanguage and Communication, 2002; 22(3):301-311-
dc.identifier.issn0271-5309-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/16138-
dc.description© 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.-
dc.description.abstractWe consider the question of whether paradoxes are essentially verbal. It is argued that paradoxes have an essentially verbal component, but that there is a special class of paradoxes, such as the “impossible triangle”, which are not wholly verbal, but partly perceptual as well. Along the way, attention is paid to explicating the idea of non-verbal content.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityChris Mortensen-
dc.description.urihttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/616/description#description-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0271-5309(02)00009-5-
dc.subjectparadox-
dc.subjectvisual-
dc.subjectlanguage-
dc.titleParadoxes inside and outside language-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0271-5309(02)00009-5-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidMortensen, C. [0009-0001-3942-2126]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 6
Philosophy publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.