Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/16340
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Do we need a hybrid law of contract? Why Hugh Collins is wrong and why it matters |
Author: | Gava, J. Greene, S. |
Citation: | Cambridge Law Journal, 2004; 63(3):605-631 |
Publisher: | Cambridge University Press |
Issue Date: | 2004 |
ISSN: | 0008-1973 1469-2139 |
Statement of Responsibility: | John Gava and Janey Greene |
Abstract: | In Regulating Contracts Hugh Collins takes up the challenge presented by 40 years of empirical studies which show that business people make little use of contract law in settling disputes, preferring instead to rely on trust and various non-legal sanctions to organise their transactions. Indeed, business parties often actively avoid the use of law because of its expense, inconvenience and tendency to harm business relationships. These findings pose a challenge to traditional doctrinal scholars. If business parties do not make much use of contract law, one has to ask what role it does play and whether the attention that is paid to it by orthodox legal scholars is misplaced. Regulating Contracts takes on this challenge directly and is the most substantial attempt made so far to explain the role of contract law in light of the questions raised as to its usefulness. |
Provenance: | Published online by Cambridge University Press 11 Nov 2004 |
Rights: | Copyright © 2004 Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0008197304006695 |
Published version: | http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=259761 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 2 Law publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
hdl_16340.pdf | Published version | 151.54 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.