Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/17594
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Fads, stereotypes and management gurus: Fayol and Follett today
Author: Parker, L.
Ritson, P.
Citation: Management Decision, 2005; 43(10):1335-1357
Publisher: Emerald Publishing Group Limited
Issue Date: 2005
ISSN: 0025-1747
Editor: Lamond, D.
Abstract: <jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>The management profession has a long and well‐documented history adopting and abandoning “fads” promulgated by a series of thinkers, practitioners, and opinion leaders who enjoy a “guru” like status. The purpose of this paper shows that stereotyping contributes to the existence of this guru‐fad phenomenon.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title><jats:p>The paper examines the characteristics of both management fads and the phenomenon of stereotyping with reference to two leading historical management practitioners and thinkers, Henri Fayol and Mary Parker Follett.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Findings</jats:title><jats:p>Drawing on the examples of Mary Parker Follett and Henri Fayol, it argues that the influence exerted by other management gurus and fads, such as Frederick Winslow Taylor's <jats:italic>Scientific Management</jats:italic> and Elton Mayo's <jats:italic>Human Relations Movement</jats:italic>, gave rise to a stereotyped view of both Follett and Fayol's work that prevented an accurate appraisal of their ideas.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Research limitations/implications</jats:title><jats:p>In addition, this paper notes that, while Follett and Fayol exhibited an extraordinary capacity to identify the very issues that have spawned many subsequent management fads, the contemporary management discipline's approach to both thinkers is quite different. While Follett has escaped her earlier stereotypes, allowing management thinkers a new opportunity to re‐assess her work and value its contemporary relevance, Fayol remains misclassified as a European Taylorist who has little to offer the contemporary management practitioner.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-heading">Originality/value</jats:title><jats:p>This paper provides an interesting insight into the characteristics of both management fads and the phenomenon of stereotyping.</jats:p></jats:sec>
Keywords: Management gurus
Management history
Management techniques
DOI: 10.1108/00251740510634903
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251740510634903
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 2
Business School publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.