Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/23449
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A global evidence-based consensus
Author: Vakil, N.
van Zanten, S.
Kahrilas, P.
Dent, J.
Jones, R.
Citation: American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2006; 101(8):1900-1920
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Issue Date: 2006
ISSN: 0002-9270
1572-0241
Organisation: Global Consensus Group
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Nimish Vakil, Sander V. van Zanten, Peter Kahrilas, John Dent, Roger Jones, and the Global Consensus Group
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: A globally acceptable definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is desirable for research and clinical practice. The aim of this initiative was to develop a consensus definition and classification that would be useful for patients, physicians, and regulatory agencies. METHODS: A modified Delphi process was employed to reach consensus using repeated iterative voting. A series of statements was developed by a working group of five experts after a systematic review of the literature in three databases (Embase, Cochrane trials register, Medline). Over a period of 2 yr, the statements were developed, modified, and approved through four rounds of voting. The voting group consisted of 44 experts from 18 countries. The final vote was conducted on a 6-point scale and consensus was defined a priori as agreement by two-thirds of the participants. RESULTS: The level of agreement strengthened throughout the process with two-thirds of the participants agreeing with 86%, 88%, 94%, and 100% of statements at each vote, respectively. At the final vote, 94% of the final 51 statements were approved by 90% of the Consensus Group, and 90% of statements were accepted with strong agreement or minor reservation. GERD was defined as a condition that develops when the reflux of stomach contents causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications. The disease was subclassified into esophageal and extraesophageal syndromes. Novel aspects of the new definition include a patient-centered approach that is independent of endoscopic findings, subclassification of the disease into discrete syndromes, and the recognition of laryngitis, cough, asthma, and dental erosions as possible GERD syndromes. It also proposes a new definition for suspected and proven Barrett's esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based global consensus definitions are possible despite differences in terminology and language, prevalence, and manifestations of the disease in different countries. A global consensus definition for GERD may simplify disease management, allow collaborative research, and make studies more generalizable, assisting patients, physicians, and regulatory agencies.
Keywords: Global Consensus Group; Humans; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Evidence-Based Medicine; Delphi Technique
RMID: 0020061378
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00630.x
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.