Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Genocide or a failure to gel? Racism, history and notionalism in Australian talk|
|Citation:||Discourse and Society, 1999; 10(3):351-378|
|Martha Augoustinos, Keith Tuffin, Mark Rapley|
|Abstract:||In a context of wide media attention to public debates about the social, political and epistemic entitlements of different groups within Australian society, an understanding of the rhetorical resources and the discursive work doen by differing constructions of `race', has become an important local issue. This article examines data from discussions between two groups of (non-indigenous) university students on a range of contemporary issues concerning race relations in Australia. Participants drew on four common discursive themes when discussing Aboriginal people. These were: an imperialist narrative of Australian history exculpatory of colonialism; an economic-rationalist/neo-liberal discourse of `productivity' and entitlement managing accountability for a contemporary Aboriginal `plight'; a local discourse of balance and even-handedness which discounted the seriousness of discrimination and racism in Australia; and a nationalist discourse stressing the necessity of all members collectively identifying as `Australian'. These interpretative resources are illustrated and discussed in terms of their rhetorical organization and social consequences. The international pervasiveness of a range of modern racist tropes and the local cultural specificity of their working-up are discussed.|
|Keywords:||Australian race relations; discourse analysis; modern racism; ordinary talk|
|Rights:||Copyright status unknown|
|Appears in Collections:||Psychology publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.