Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/35629
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Conflicts of interest in divisions of general practice
Author: Palmer, N.
Braunack-Mayer, A.
Rogers, W.
Provis, C.
Cullity, G.
Citation: Journal of Medical Ethics, 2006; 32(12):715-717
Publisher: British Med Journal Publ Group
Issue Date: 2006
ISSN: 0306-6800
1473-4257
Statement of
Responsibility: 
N Palmer, A Braunack-Mayer, W Rogers, C Provis and G Cullity
Abstract: Community-based healthcare organisations manage competing, and often conflicting, priorities. These conflicts can arise from the multiple roles these organisations take up, and from the diverse range of stakeholders to whom they must be responsive. Often such conflicts may be titled conflicts of interest; however, what precisely constitutes such conflicts and what should be done about them is not always clear. Clarity about the duties owed by organisations and the roles they assume can help identify and manage some of these conflicts. Taking divisions of general practice in Australia as an example, this paper sets out to distinguish two main types of conflicts of interest, so that they may be more clearly identified and more effectively managed.
Keywords: Humans; Physician's Role; Physician-Patient Relations; Decision Making; Family Practice; Ethics, Clinical; Conflict of Interest; Australia
Description: Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.
RMID: 0020062051
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2005.014811
Appears in Collections:Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_35629.pdf95.29 kBPublisher's PDF View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.