Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/40469
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hill, L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Young, S. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Australian Journal of Political Science, 2007; 42(3):515-521 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1036-1146 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1742-9536 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/40469 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Some opponents of compulsory voting claim that rising rates of informal voting point to growing antipathy towards the institution. In order to test this claim we examine recent trends in informal voting, focusing upon some recent figures, particularly those of the 2004 Federal election when there was a sharp rise in informal votes. We suggest that it is not compulsion that is leading to informal voting but rather complexity and its interactions with sociological factors that are brought into play by near-universal turnout. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Lisa Hill & Sally Young | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Carfax Publishing | - |
dc.rights | © 2007 Informa UK Ltd. | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10361140701513646 | - |
dc.title | Protest or error? Informal voting and compulsory voting | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/10361140701513646 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Hill, L. [0000-0002-9098-7800] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest History publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.