Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/4087
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTurnbull, D.-
dc.contributor.authorShields, N.-
dc.contributor.authorMcGinley, M.-
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, A.-
dc.contributor.authorCheyne, H.-
dc.contributor.authorReid, M.-
dc.contributor.authorYoung, D.-
dc.contributor.authorHarper Gilmour, W.-
dc.date.issued1999-
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Midwifery, 1999; 7(8):499-503-
dc.identifier.issn0969-4900-
dc.identifier.issn2052-4307-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/4087-
dc.description.abstract<jats:p> This study aimed to determine whether a midwife-managed programme could improve continuity of care over that achieved by shared care (i.e. care divided between hospital doctors, midwives and GPs). A randomized controlled trial (analysis by intention to treat) was conducted at the Glasgow Royal Maternity Hospital, which compared 648 women allocated to receive midwife-managed care and 651 allocated to receive shared care. The two main study outcomes were continuity of advice and continuity of carer. Data were collected via questions included in self-report questionnaires sent to women's homes at three time periods (response rates ranged from 63.1% to 85.3%) and a case record review. Women in the midwife-managed group reported receiving more consistent advice across all care periods. For example, during antenatal care, 51.0% of women in the midwife group reported receiving consistent advice all of the time, compared with 21.2% of women in the shared-care group (difference [diff] = 29.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI]; 24.1% to 35.6%). Overall, women in the midwife-managed group saw seven fewer care providers (midwife care mean = 10.0 [standard deviation [SD] = 6.3]; shared care mean = 17.1 [SD = 6.1], diff = -7.1; 95% CI; -8.4 to -5.8). At 7 months follow-up, 4.0% of women in the midwife group reported that they had seen too many or far too many staff during their care, compared with 28.3% of women in the shared care group (diff = -24.3%; 95% CI;-30.7% to -17.8%). These results suggest that midwife-managed care programmes can improve continuity of care. </jats:p>-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityDeborah Turnbull, Noreen Shields, Mary McGinley, Ann Holmes, Helen Cheyne, Margaret Reid, Denise Young and W Harper Gilmour-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherMark Allen Group-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjom.1999.7.8.8285-
dc.titleCan midwife-managed units improve continuity of care?-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.12968/bjom.1999.7.8.8285-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidTurnbull, D. [0000-0002-7116-7073]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 6
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.