Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/53834
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIwata, D.en
dc.contributor.authorBroun, H.en
dc.contributor.authorBlack, A.en
dc.contributor.authorPreston, C.en
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, G.en
dc.date.issued2008en
dc.identifier.citationVeterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2008; 21(3):221-230en
dc.identifier.issn0932-0814en
dc.identifier.issn2567-6911en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/53834-
dc.description.abstractA retrospective multi-centre study was carried out in order to compare outcomes between cemented and uncemented total hip arthoplasties (THA). A quantitative orthopaedic outcome assessment scoring system was devised in order to relate functional outcome to a numerical score, to allow comparison between treatments and amongst centres. The system combined a radiographic score and a clinical score. Lower scores reflect better outcomes than higher scores. Consecutive cases of THA were included from two specialist practices between July 2002 and December 2005. The study included 46 THA patients (22 uncemented THA followed for 8.3 +/- 4.7M and 24 cemented THA for 26.0 +/- 15.7M) with a mean age of 4.4 +/- 3.3 years at surgery. Multi-variable linear and logistical regression analyses were performed with adjustments for age at surgery, surgeon, follow-up time, uni- versus bilateral disease, gender and body weight. The differences between treatment groups in terms of functional scores or total scores were not significant (p > 0.05). Radiographic scores were different between treatment groups. However, these scores were usually assessed within two months of surgery and proved unreliable predictors of functional outcome (p > 0.05). The findings reflect relatively short-term follow-up, especially for the uncemented group, and do not include clinician-derived measures, such as goniometry and thigh circumference. Longer-term follow-up for the radiographic assessments is essential. A prospective study including the clinician-derived outcomes needs to be performed in order to validate the outcome instrument in its modified form.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityD. Iwata, H. C. Broun, A. P. Black, C. A. Preston and I. Andersonen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherF K Schattauer Verlag GMBHen
dc.source.urihttp://www.schattauer.de/de/magazine/uebersicht/zeitschriften-a-z/vcot/contents/archive/issue/special/manuscript/9937/show.htmlen
dc.subjectcanine; outcome assessment; arthroplasty; Hipen
dc.titleTotal hip arthroplasty outcomes assessment using functional and radiographic scores to compare canine systemsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0020081216en
dc.identifier.doi10.1055/s-0037-1617365en
dc.identifier.pubid42975-
pubs.library.collectionAnimal and Veterinary Sciences publicationsen
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
Appears in Collections:Animal and Veterinary Sciences publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.