Adelaide Research & Scholarship
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/55870
| Citations | ||
| Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
|---|---|---|
|
?
|
?
|
|
| Type: | Journal article |
| Title: | Valuing diversity for sustainable futures: A response to Wood and Lenné |
| Other Titles: | Valuing diversity for sustainable futures: A response to Wood and Lenne |
| Author: | Bardsley, D. |
| Citation: | Land Use Policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, 2006; 23(4):643-644 |
| Publisher: | Elsevier Sci Ltd |
| Issue Date: | 2006 |
| ISSN: | 0264-8377 |
| Statement of Responsibility: | Douglas Bardsley |
| Abstract: | The paper addresses the claim made recently in this journal [Wood, D., Lenné, J.M., 2005. 'Received Wisdom' in agricultural land use policy: 10 years on from Rio. Land Use Policy 22, 75-93] that in situ agrobiodiversity conservation is anti-development. In particular, I argue that Wood and Lenné appear to have misinterpreted the human ecology paradigm. My proposition is that opportunities are emerging that effectively support local diversity for multiple conservation and development outcomes within marginal agricultural systems. © 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
| Keywords: | Agrobiodiversity Biodiversity conservation Risk Agricultural development Developing countries |
| Description: | Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.11.002 |
| Published version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.11.002 |
| Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest Geography, Environment and Population publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.