Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/56607
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Anderson, Kym | en |
dc.contributor.author | Giesecke, James Andrew David | en |
dc.contributor.author | Valenzuela, Ernesto | en |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | en |
dc.identifier.isbn | 0732615836 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1031-9034 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/56607 | - |
dc.description.abstract | For decades rural Australia has been discriminated against by industrial policies at home and agricultural protectionism abroad. While agricultural export taxation in poor countries had the opposite impact, recent reforms there mean that that offsetting effect on Australia has diminished. There has also been some re-instrumentation of rich-country farm policies away from trade measures. This paper draws on new evidence to examine whether Australian farmers and rural regions are still adversely affected by farm price-distortive policies abroad, using a global and a national economy-wide model. The results vindicate the continuing push by Australia's rural communities for multilateral agricultural trade liberalization | en |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Kym Anderson, James Giesecke and Ernesto Valenzuela | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Monash University, Centre of Policy Studies and the Impact Project | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | General paper (IMPACT Project (Australia)) ; G-176 | en |
dc.subject | trade liberalisation; rural income; regional CGE | en |
dc.title | How would global trade liberalization affect rural and regional incomes in Australia? | en |
dc.type | Report | en |
dc.contributor.school | School of Economics | en |
Appears in Collections: | Economics publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.