Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/56607
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Kymen
dc.contributor.authorGiesecke, James Andrew Daviden
dc.contributor.authorValenzuela, Ernestoen
dc.date.issued2008en
dc.identifier.isbn0732615836en
dc.identifier.issn1031-9034en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/56607-
dc.description.abstractFor decades rural Australia has been discriminated against by industrial policies at home and agricultural protectionism abroad. While agricultural export taxation in poor countries had the opposite impact, recent reforms there mean that that offsetting effect on Australia has diminished. There has also been some re-instrumentation of rich-country farm policies away from trade measures. This paper draws on new evidence to examine whether Australian farmers and rural regions are still adversely affected by farm price-distortive policies abroad, using a global and a national economy-wide model. The results vindicate the continuing push by Australia's rural communities for multilateral agricultural trade liberalizationen
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityKym Anderson, James Giesecke and Ernesto Valenzuelaen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMonash University, Centre of Policy Studies and the Impact Projecten
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGeneral paper (IMPACT Project (Australia)) ; G-176en
dc.subjecttrade liberalisation; rural income; regional CGEen
dc.titleHow would global trade liberalization affect rural and regional incomes in Australia?en
dc.typeReporten
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Economicsen
Appears in Collections:Economics publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.