Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
Type: Journal article
Title: Cholesterol-lowering therapy and the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme: a population study
Author: Adams, R.
Appleton, S.
Wilson, D.
Taylor, A.
Chittleborough, C.
Gill, T.
Ruffin, R.
Citation: Australian Health Review, 2009; 33(2):325-333
Publisher: Australian Healthcare Association
Issue Date: 2009
ISSN: 0156-5788
Statement of
Robert J Adams, Sarah Appleton, David H Wilson, Anne W Taylor, Catherine Chittleborough, Tiffany Gill and Richard E Ruffin
Abstract: Objective: The Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) expanded the criteria for eligibility for subsidised lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in 2006. The aim of this study was to determine the use of LLT in a representative Australian population in relation to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, and the effectiveness of the therapy in meeting target levels. Design: Cross-sectional biomedical study with telephone interviews, questionnaires, clinical measurements, and PBS dispensing data. Subjects: Representative population sample of 4060 urban adults aged _18 years attending for the biomedical examination in 2001. Results: Of the 406 who qualified for PBS-subsidised LLT at that time, only 88 (21.5%) were actually on LLT. National Heart Foundation of Australia (NHF) recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels of < 2.5 mmol/L were recorded in only 13% (528) of the population, and in 46.8% of those on LLT. Of those on LLT, 76% had total cholesterol < 5.5 mmol/L, but over 80% had total cholesterol levels above NHF-recommended levels of 4.0 mmol/L. Of the 842 classified at the highest CVD risk, only 26% were using LLT. Those aged > 60 years and on low incomes were significantly more likely to use LLT. The new PBS criteria will expand eligibility to include nearly 20% of adults. Conclusions: The majority of people at high risk of CVD were not receiving LLT, and LLT is not being used to its full effectiveness. People with low incomes or on government benefits or pensions were not less likely to use LLT than others under the PBS scheme. Whether higher copayments for those on low incomes who do not qualify for concessional payments is a significant barrier to LLT use needs further research.
Keywords: Humans
Cardiovascular Diseases
Risk Factors
Cross-Sectional Studies
Middle Aged
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Insurance Benefits
Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services
Eligibility Determination
Hypolipidemic Agents
DOI: 10.1071/AH090325
Description (link):;dn=161647693469040;res=IELHEA
Published version:
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.