Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/60403
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMathias, J.en
dc.contributor.authorLucas, L.en
dc.date.issued2009en
dc.identifier.citationInternational Psychogeriatrics, 2009; 21(4):637-653en
dc.identifier.issn1041-6102en
dc.identifier.issn1741-203Xen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/60403-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Older drivers are at a higher risk of being involved in a motor vehicle accident. However, on-road assessments of all older drivers are impractical, highlighting the need to screen for potentially unsafe drivers. This study undertook a meta-analysis of research examining the cognitive predictors of driving ability in older drivers in order to provide an evidence-based method for screening drivers. Methods: Comprehensive searches were undertaken of the PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Health-Source Nursing electronic databases between 1980 and 2007 in order to identify studies that examined cognitive differences between drivers aged over 55 years who either passed or failed a driving assessment. Twenty-one studies were eligible for inclusion. Weighted Cohen's d effect sizes, percentage overlap statistics, Fail-safe Ns and 95% CIs were calculated for all cognitive tests. Results: The best predictors of on-road driving were the Ergovision and Useful Field of View (UFOV) tests, a complex RT task, Paper Folding task, Dot Counting, WMS Visual Reproduction, and Computerized Visual Attention Task. Simulator driving performance was best predicted by the Benton Line Orientation Task, Clock Drawing, a Driver Scanning task, the UFOV, WAIS Picture Arrangement and MMSE. Finally, the Trail Making Test, Stroop, UFOV, WAIS Block Design, and Automated Psychophysical Test were good predictors of driving problems. Conclusions: There are a variety of tests that appear suitable for screening older drivers, the exact choice of which depends on the “gold standard” for determining driving ability (on-road driving, driving simulator, driving problems) and whether a computerized or paper-and-pencil task is required.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJ. L. Mathias and L. K. Lucasen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.rightsCopyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2009en
dc.subjectdriving ability; driver assessment; cognitive function; license renewal; screen; older driversen
dc.titleCognitive predictors of unsafe driving in older drivers: a meta-analysisen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0020091227en
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1041610209009119en
dc.identifier.pubid38489-
pubs.library.collectionPsychology publicationsen
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidMathias, J. [0000-0001-8957-8594]en
Appears in Collections:Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.