Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/6210
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Laven, G. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Beilby, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wilkinson, D. | - |
dc.contributor.author | McElroy, H. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Medical Journal of Australia, 2003; 179(2):75-79 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0025-729X | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1326-5377 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/6210 | - |
dc.description | The document attached has been archived with permission from the editor of the Medical Journal of Australia (10 January 2008). An external link to the publisher’s copy is included. | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To determine the factors associated with general practitioners' current practice location, with particular emphasis on rural location. Design: Observational, retrospective, case–control study using a self-administered questionnaire. Setting: Australian general practices in December 2000. Participants: 2414 Australian-trained rural and urban GPs. Main outcome measure: Current urban or rural practice location. Results: For Australia as a whole, rural GPs were more likely to be male (odds ratio [OR], 1.42; 95% CI, 1.17–1.73), Australian-born (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.55–2.45), and to report attending a rural primary school for "some" (OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.69–2.89) or "all" (OR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.94–4.00) of their primary schooling. Rural GPs' partners or spouses were also more likely to report "some" (OR, 2.75; 95% CI, 2.07–3.66) or "all" (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 2.02–4.05) rural primary schooling. A rural background in both GP and partner produced the highest likelihood of rural practice (OR, 6.28; 95% CI, 4.26–9.25). For individual jurisdictions, a trend towards more rural GPs being men was only significant in Tasmania. In all jurisdictions except Tasmania and the Northern Territory, rural GPs were more likely to be Australian-born. Conclusions: GPs' and their partners' rural background (residence and primary and secondary schooling) influences choice of practice location, with partners' background appearing to exert more influence. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Gillian A Laven, Justin J Beilby, David Wilkinson and Heather J McElroy | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Australasian Med Publ Co Ltd | - |
dc.source.uri | http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/179_02_210703/lav10646_fm.html | - |
dc.subject | Humans | - |
dc.subject | Health Care Surveys | - |
dc.subject | Case-Control Studies | - |
dc.subject | Retrospective Studies | - |
dc.subject | Career Choice | - |
dc.subject | Residence Characteristics | - |
dc.subject | Adult | - |
dc.subject | Aged | - |
dc.subject | Middle Aged | - |
dc.subject | Physicians, Family | - |
dc.subject | Rural Health Services | - |
dc.subject | Professional Practice Location | - |
dc.subject | Australia | - |
dc.subject | Female | - |
dc.subject | Male | - |
dc.title | Factors associated with rural practice among Australian-trained general practitioners | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05439.x | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Laven, G. [0000-0002-9726-1754] | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | McElroy, H. [0000-0003-3650-1141] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest General Practice publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
hdl_6210.pdf | Published version | 119.36 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.