Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/62929
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAnkeny, R.en
dc.date.issued2010en
dc.identifier.citationHistory and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 2010; 32(1):91-104en
dc.identifier.issn0391-9714en
dc.identifier.issn1742-6316en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/62929-
dc.description.abstractScholarship in the history of biology focused on model organisms has burgeoned along with the growth of the use of these organisms in genetic research in the closing decades of the 20th century. This paper draws on criticisms of model organism-based research, particularly the epistemological dangers of focus on a relatively limited number of species whose very development has become canalized through processes of standardization, to articulate the analogous historical pitfalls of these blinders for developing a fuller history of genetics and genomics.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityR. A. Ankenyen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden
dc.rightsCopyright status unknownen
dc.subjectAnimals; Humans; Models, Animal; Genetics; Genetic Research; Human Genome Project; Genomics; Phylogeny; Knowledge; Biomedical Research; Historiography; History, 20th Century; History, 21st Centuryen
dc.titleHistoriographic reflections on model organisms: Or how the mureaucracy may be limiting our understanding of contemporary genetics and genomicsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0020100774en
dc.identifier.pubid33359-
pubs.library.collectionHistory publicationsen
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidAnkeny, R. [0000-0002-1547-6031]en
Appears in Collections:History publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.