Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBerry, J.en
dc.contributor.authorRyan, P.en
dc.contributor.authorBraunack-Mayer, A.en
dc.contributor.authorDuszynski, K.en
dc.contributor.authorXafis, V.en
dc.contributor.authorGold, M.en
dc.identifier.citationTrials, 2011; 12(1):1-10en
dc.descriptionExtent: 10p.en
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Vaccine Assessment using Linked Data (VALiD) trial compared opt-in and opt-out parental consent for a population-based childhood vaccine safety surveillance program using data linkage. A subsequent telephone interview of all households enrolled in the trial elicited parental intent regarding the return or non-return of reply forms for opt-in and opt-out consent. This paper describes the rationale for the trial and provides an overview of the design and methods. Methods/Design: Single-centre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial (RCT) stratified by firstborn status. Mothers who gave birth at one tertiary South Australian hospital were randomised at six weeks post-partum to receive an opt-in or opt-out reply form, along with information explaining data linkage. The primary outcome at 10 weeks post-partum was parental participation in each arm, as indicated by the respective return or non-return of a reply form (or via telephone or email response). A subsequent telephone interview at 10 weeks post-partum elicited parental intent regarding the return or non-return of the reply form, and attitudes and knowledge about data linkage, vaccine safety, consent preferences and vaccination practices. Enrolment began in July 2009 and 1,129 households were recruited in a three-month period. Analysis has not yet been undertaken. The participation rate and selection bias for each method of consent will be compared when the data are analysed. Discussion: The VALiD RCT represents the first trial of opt-in versus opt-out consent for a data linkage study that assesses consent preferences and intent compared with actual opting in or opting out behaviour, and socioeconomic factors. The limitations to generalisability are discussed.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJesia G Berry, Philip Ryan, Annette J Braunack-Mayer, Katherine M Duszynski, Vicki Xafis, Michael S Gold, the Vaccine Assessment Using Linked Data (VALiD) Working Groupen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.en
dc.rights© 2011 Berry et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly citeden
dc.subjectVaccine Assessment Using Linked Data (VALiD) Working Group; Humans; Vaccines; Immunization Schedule; Data Collection; Population Surveillance; Health Care Surveys; Medical Record Linkage; Single-Blind Method; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Health Behavior; Parents; Research Design; Parental Consent; Socioeconomic Factors; Infant; Immunization Programs; South Australiaen
dc.titleA randomised controlled trial to compare opt-in and opt-out parental consent for childhood vaccine safety surveillance using data linkage: study protocolen
dc.typeJournal articleen
pubs.library.collectionPublic Health publicationsen
dc.identifier.orcidBerry, J. [0000-0002-4446-7927]en
dc.identifier.orcidBraunack-Mayer, A. [0000-0003-4427-0224]en
dc.identifier.orcidXafis, V. [0000-0002-5104-9686]en
dc.identifier.orcidGold, M. [0000-0003-1312-5331]en
Appears in Collections:Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_69150.pdfPublished version316.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.