Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFrancois, J.en
dc.contributor.authorHoekman, B.en
dc.contributor.authorManchin, M.en
dc.identifier.citationWorld Bank Economic Review, 2006; 20(2):197-216en
dc.description.abstractBecause of concern that tariff reductions in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries will translate into worsening export performance for the least developed countries, the erosion of trade preferences may become a stumbling block for multilateral trade liberalization. An econometric analysis of actual preference use shows that preferences are underused because of administrative burdens—estimated to be equivalent to an average of 4 percent of the value of goods traded. To quantify the maximum scope for preference erosion, the compliance cost estimates are used in a model-based assessment of the impact of full elimination of OECD tariffs. Taking into account administrative costs eliminates erosion costs in the aggregate and greatly reduces the losses for countries most affected by preference erosion.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJoseph Francois, Bernard Hoekman, and Miriam Manchinen
dc.publisherWorld Bank Publicationsen
dc.rights© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail:
dc.titlePreference Erosion and Multilateral Trade Liberalizationen
dc.typeJournal articleen
pubs.library.collectionEconomics publicationsen
Appears in Collections:Economics publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.