Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/71303
Type: Thesis
Title: Auditory measures of intelligence and intelligence-related functions: where have we come from and where to from here?
Author: Zajac, Ian Taylor
Issue Date: 2011
School/Discipline: School of Psychology
Abstract: Much of what is known of the nature of human intelligence derives from research concerned primarily with visually presented tests. This thesis, on the other hand, sought to extend this knowledge by exploring intelligence as expressed in the auditory modality. More specifically, the dissertation reports on a series of studies designed to broadly examine the extent to which existing broad ability constructs defined in modern intelligence taxonomies are expressed in performance on auditory tasks. The reason for doing so reflects the largely untested assumption that constructs like fluid and crystallised intelligence, for example, are not modality specific but cognitively general. Study 1 aimed to purposely design auditory tests to measure the broad construct general speed of processing (Gs). N=96 university undergraduates completed these new auditory tasks together with a selection of existing putative auditory Gs measures, and also a selection of established visual Gs marker tests. The new auditory tasks were found to display good reliability and, together with the visual tests, they defined moderately correlated broad Gs and RT speed factors. Study 2 extended the findings of Study 1. In particular, in light of the underrepresentation of visual tasks in the previous study, it sought to increase the number of visual Gs tests to investigate the presence of modality specific speed factors. N=80 university undergraduates completed the test battery. Several structural models were tested in which modality specific speed factors were specified; however, these models were not supported. Instead, results supported those found in Study 1: auditory and visual tests combine to define broad Gs and RT speed factors. Study 3 examined existing measures of temporal discrimination. Although it has recently been suggested that these tasks provide a direct measure of neural efficiency they appear in fact to be cognitively complex, possibly relying on memory functions. Therefore, N=66 university undergraduates completed a battery of tests measuring temporal discrimination, memory (Gm) and speed (Gs). Results showed that temporal tasks related more strongly and consistently with Gm than Gs. Further re-analysis of previously published data supported these findings with Gm functions mediating the relationship between temporal tasks and general intelligence. Study 4 explored Auditory Inspection Time (AIT) tasks and their relationship to measures of Gs. N=96 university undergraduates completed these tasks and measures of Gs. Of the three variations of AIT, only the spatial version related well to Gs. A distinct and independent AIT factor was also identified which supports previous suggestions that these tasks largely reflect auditory perceptual processes. Based on the results of all studies it is concluded that broad constructs defined in intelligence theories can be indexed auditorily provided that sufficient effort is devoted to ensuring the auditory tasks emphasise the cognitive processes underpinning the constructs of interest. Further, it is recommended that future studies of the auditory modality consider their tasks in relation to existing broad constructs and that auditory tasks be incorporated into intelligence testing.
Advisor: Burns, Nicholas Ralph
Danthiir, Vanessa
Nettelbeck, Theodore John
Dissertation Note: Thesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, School of Psychology, 2011
Keywords: auditory intelligence; individual differences; speed of processing; cognitive psychology
Provenance: Copyright material removed from digital thesis. See print copy in University of Adelaide Library for full text.
Appears in Collections:Research Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01front.pdf76.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02whole.pdf2.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.