Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/73702
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Consent for pediatric anesthesia: an observational study
Author: Lagana, Z.
Foster, A.
Bibbo, A.
Dowling, K.
Cyna, A.
Citation: Paediatric Anaesthesia, 2012; 22(8):787-792
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Issue Date: 2012
ISSN: 1155-5645
1460-9592
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Zoe Lagana, Andrew Foster, Adriana Bibbo, Kate Dowling and Allan M. Cyna
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Informed consent prior to anesthesia is an important part of the pediatric pre-anesthetic consultation. This study aimed to observe and identify the number and nature of the anesthesia risks considered and communicated to parents/guardians and children during the pediatric informed consent process on the day of elective surgery. METHODS: A convenience sample of anesthetists had their pre-anesthesia consultations voice recorded, prior to elective surgery, during a 4-month period at the largest tertiary referral centre for pediatric care in South Australia. A data collection form was used to note baseline demographic data, and voice recording transcripts were independently documented by two researchers and subsequently compared for accuracy regarding the number and nature of risks discussed. RESULTS: Of the 96 voice recordings, 91 (92%) were suitable for the analysis. The five most commonly discussed risks were as follows: nausea and vomiting (36%); sore throat (35%); allergy (29%); hypoxia (25%); and emergence delirium (19%). Twenty-seven pre-anesthetic consultations (30%) were found to have had no discussion of anesthetic risk at all while a further 23 consultations (26%) incorporated general statements inferring that anesthesia carried risks, but with no elaboration about their nature, ramifications or incidence. The median number of risks (IQR) specifically mentioned per consultation was higher, 3 (1) vs 1 (1), P < 0.05, when the consultation was performed by a trainee rather than a consultant anesthetist and when the patient had previous anesthesia experience odds ratio 0.34, 95% CI [0.13, 0.87], P = 0.025. CONCLUSIONS: The pediatric anesthesia risk discussion is very variable. Trainees tend to discuss more specific risks than consultants and a patient’s previous experience of anesthesia was associated with a more limited discussion of anesthesia risk.
Keywords: Communication
consent
anesthesia risk
preoperative assessment
children
Rights: © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03770.x
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03770.x
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.