Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/78633
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorForsyth, A.-
dc.contributor.authorStewart, A.-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationMelbourne University Law Review, 2013; 36(3):785-830-
dc.identifier.issn0025-8938-
dc.identifier.issn1839-3810-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/78633-
dc.description.abstractThe Qantas industrial dispute made headlines around the world, after the airline took the drastic step in October 2011 of grounding its fleet ahead of a proposed lockout of a large proportion of its workforce. Essentially a contest between job security and employment flexibility, the dispute was one of the most significant in Australia for some time. This article examines the origins and circumstances of the Qantas dispute and the issues it highlighted as to the operation of key aspects of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). We conclude that, particularly in light of the federal industrial tribunal’s endorsement of the airline’s strategy and support for the concept of ‘managerial prerogative’, the dispute may have long-term implications for workplace regulation in Australia.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAnthony Forsyth and Andrew Stewart-
dc.description.urihttp://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/mulr/issues/previous-issues/2012-volume-36/2012-volume-36-3-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherMelbourne University Law Review-
dc.rightsCopyright status unknown-
dc.source.urihttp://www.mulr.com.au/issues/36_3/36_3_1.pdf-
dc.titleOf 'kamikazes' and 'mad men': the fallout from the QANTAS industrial dispute-
dc.typeJournal article-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidStewart, A. [0000-0002-9758-3753]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Law publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_78633.pdf
  Restricted Access
Restricted Access366.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.