Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/79289
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMathias, J.en
dc.contributor.authorDennington, V.en
dc.contributor.authorBowden, S.en
dc.contributor.authorBigler, E.en
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.citationBrain Injury, 2013; 27(7-8):887-895en
dc.identifier.issn0269-9052en
dc.identifier.issn1362-301Xen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/79289-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Community (CC) or orthopaedic/injury (OC) control groups are typically used to evaluate the consequences of traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). Whereas CCs match for demographic variables and are readily available, OCs may additionally control for other preand post-injury variables but are more costly to recruit. Together, they enable an evaluation of brain- vs general-injury effects. However, the comparability of these two groups and the increase in control over confounding variables when OCs are used has rarely been examined. METHOD: The current study compared samples of CCs (n¼71) and OCs (n¼69), aged between 18–80, on a range of demographic (age, gender, education, socio-economic status), background (medical history, handedness), psychosocial (alcohol use, fatigue, pain, depression, social support, community integration, ‘post-concussion’ symptoms) and cognitive (motor and processing speed, memory, intellectual ability) variables. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable on all variables, except alcohol use, with the OC group having higher levels of alcohol consumption. However, alcohol use did not correlate with any other variable, including commonly used measures of outcome following TBI. CONCLUSION: The current findings suggest that an orthopaedic injury control group does not have any clear advantages over a carefully recruited community control group.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJ.L. Mathias, V. Dennington, S.C. Bowden and E.D. Bigleren
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden
dc.rights© 2013 Informa UK Ltd.en
dc.subjectCommunity controls; control groups; injury controls; orthopedic controls; research design; TBI; traumatic brain injury; trauma controlsen
dc.titleCommunity versus orthopaedic controls in traumatic brain injury research: how comparable are they?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0020130353en
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/02699052.2013.793398en
dc.identifier.pubid18906-
pubs.library.collectionPsychology publicationsen
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidMathias, J. [0000-0001-8957-8594]en
Appears in Collections:Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.