Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/7968
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStapleton, D.-
dc.contributor.authorMacLennan, A.-
dc.contributor.authorKristiansson, P.-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2002; 42(5):482-485-
dc.identifier.issn0004-8666-
dc.identifier.issn1479-828X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/7968-
dc.descriptionThe definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com-
dc.description.abstractObjective To determine the prevalence of low back pain during pregnancy (LBPP) in an Australian Results population. Design A representative population-based survey of women aged 15 years and older. Setting and sample Four thousand four hundred randomly selected South Australian households were visited by trained surveyors who interviewed 1531 women (69.7% response rate) using pre-tested questions. Methods The South Australian Health Omnibus survey was utilised. Main outcome measures Demographic data were collected along with details of previous pregnancies, and degree of back pain during pregnancy, treatment regimens, and persistence of back pain. Results Thirty-five and a half per cent of women recall having at least moderately severe back pain during pregnancy. Women who reported such back pain were younger, were more likely to report ill health and be unemployed. Increasing parity was not associated with current back pain. The most commonly used treatments were bed rest, pain killing medication, physiotherapy, and chiropractic treatment. Half of those with symptoms were untreated. Sixtyeight per cent of women who experienced moderate or worse low back pain during pregnancy continued to experience recurring low back pain with a self reported reduction in their health. Conclusions Chronic low back pain is commonly associated with an onset in pregnancy subjectively contributing to long-term morbidity. The high prevalence may be an underestimate in view of the potential for recall bias in older women.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityDavid B Stapleton, Alastair H MacLennan, Per Kristiansson-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherAustralian NZ J Obstet Gynaec-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00482.x-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectLow Back Pain-
dc.subjectPregnancy Complications-
dc.subjectChronic Disease-
dc.subjectPopulation Surveillance-
dc.subjectPrevalence-
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studies-
dc.subjectPregnancy-
dc.subjectAdolescent-
dc.subjectAdult-
dc.subjectAged-
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over-
dc.subjectMiddle Aged-
dc.subjectAustralia-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.titleThe prevalence of recalled low back pain during and after pregnancy: a South Australian population survey-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00482.x-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.