Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/85154
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: The value of medical history taking as risk indicator for tuboperitoneal pathology: a systematic review
Author: Luttjeboer, F.
Verhoeve, H.
van Dessel, H.
van der Veen, F.
Mol, B.
Coppus, S.
Citation: BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2009; 116(5):612-625
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Issue Date: 2009
ISSN: 1470-0328
1471-0528
Statement of
Responsibility: 
FY Luttjeboer, HR Verhoeve, HJ van Dessel, F van der Veen, BWJ Mol, and SFPJ Coppus
Abstract: Background: Guidelines recommend diagnostic laparoscopy in subfertile women with known co-morbidities in their medical history. Aggregated evidence underpinning these recommendations is, however, currently lacking. Objective: The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available evidence on the association between items reported during medical history taking and tuboperitoneal pathology. Search strategy: MEDLINE (from 1966 to May 2007), EMBASE (from 1960 to January 2007) and bibliographies of retrieved primary articles. Selection criteria: All relevant studies that compared medical history with the presence or absence of tubal pathology. Data collection and analysis Studies: comparing medical history with the presence or absence of tubal pathology were included. A diagnosis of tubal pathology had to be made by hysterosalpingography, laparoscopy or a combination of both. In the absence of invasive tubal testing, tuboperitoneal pathology was considered to be absent in case of intrauterine pregnancy. Homogeneity between studies was assessed, and the association between medical history and tubal pathology was expressed as a common odds ratio with a 95% CI. No language restriction was applied. Main results: We included 32 studies. In cohort studies, strong associations were found for a history of complicated appendicitis (OR 7.2, 95% CI 2.2–22.8), pelvic surgery (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4–9.0) and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.6–6.6), and in case–control studies, for a history of complicated appendicitis (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.8–6.3), PID (OR 5.5, 95% CI 2.7–11.0), ectopic pregnancy (OR 16.0, 95% CI 12.5–20.4), endometriosis (OR 5.9, 95% CI 3.2–10.8) and sexually transmitted disease (OR 11.9, 95% CI 4.3–33.3). Author’s conclusions: Subfertile women reporting a history of PID, complicated appendicitis, pelvic surgery, ectopic pregnancy and endometriosis are at increased risk of having tuboperitoneal pathology. In these women, diagnostic laparoscopy should be offered early in the fertility work-up.
Keywords: Anamnesis; history; hysterosalpingography; laparoscopy; tubal pathology
Rights: © 2009 The Authors.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02070.x
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02070.x
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.