Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMathias, J.en
dc.contributor.authorHarman-Smith, Y.en
dc.contributor.authorBowden, S.en
dc.contributor.authorRosenfeld, J.en
dc.contributor.authorBigler, E.en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Neurotrauma, 2014; 31(7):658-669en
dc.description.abstractClinical research into outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI) frequently combines injuries that have been sustained through different causes (e.g., car accidents, assaults, and falls), the effect of which is not well understood. This study examined the contribution of injury-related psychological trauma—which is more commonly associated with specific types of injuries—to outcomes after nonpenetrating TBI in order to determine whether it may be having a differential effect in samples containing mixed injuries. Data from three groups that were prospectively recruited for two larger studies were compared: one that sustained a TBI as a result of physical assaults (i.e., psychologically traumatizing) and another as a result of sporting injuries (i.e., nonpsychologically traumatizing), as well as an orthopedic control group (OC). Psychosocial and emotional (postconcussion symptoms, injury-related stress, and depression), cognitive (memory, abstract reasoning, problem solving, and verbal fluency), and functional (general outcome; resumption of home, social, and work roles) outcomes were all assessed. The TBIassault group reported significantly poorer psychosocial and emotional outcomes and higher rates of litigation (criminal rather than civil) than both the TBIsport and OC groups approximately 6 months postinjury, but there were no differences in the cognitive or functional outcomes of the three groups. The findings suggest that the cause of a TBI may assist in explaining some of the differences in outcomes of people who have seemingly comparable injuries. Involvement in litigation and the cause of an injury may also be confounded, which may lead to the erroneous conclusion that litigants have poorer outcomes.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJane L. Mathias, Yasmin Harman-Smith, Stephen C. Bowden, Jeffrey V. Rosenfeld, and Erin D. Bigleren
dc.publisherMary Ann Lieberten
dc.rights© Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.en
dc.subjectAssault; outcome; post-traumatic stress; psychological trauma; sporting injury; traumatic brain injuryen
dc.titleContribution of psychological trauma to outcomes after traumatic brain injury: assaults versus sporting injuriesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
pubs.library.collectionPsychology publicationsen
dc.identifier.orcidMathias, J. [0000-0001-8957-8594]en
Appears in Collections:Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.