Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/87389
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArora, A.-
dc.contributor.authorLam, A.-
dc.contributor.authorKarami, Z.-
dc.contributor.authorDo, L.-
dc.contributor.authorHarris, M.-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Oral Health, 2014; 14(1):111-1-111-8-
dc.identifier.issn1472-6831-
dc.identifier.issn1472-6831-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/87389-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyse the readability of paediatric oral health education leaflets available in Australia. METHODS: Forty paediatric oral health education materials were analysed for general readability according to the following parameters: Thoroughness; Textual framework; Terminology; and Readability (Flesch-Kincaid grade level (FKGL), Gunning Fog index (Fog) and Simplified Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG)). RESULTS: Leaflets produced by the industry were among the hardest to read with an average readability at the 8th grade (8.4 ± 0.1). The readability of leaflets produced by the commercial sector was at the 7th grade (7.1 ± 1.7) and the government at the 6th grade (6.3 ± 1.9). The FKGL consistently yielded readabilities 2 grades below the Fog and SMOG indexes. In the content analyses, 14 essential paediatric oral health topics were noted and Early Childhood Caries (ECC) was identified as the most commonly used jargon term. CONCLUSION: Paediatric oral health education materials are readily available, yet their quality and readability vary widely and may be difficult to read for disadvantaged populations in Australia. A redesign of these leaflets while taking literacy into consideration is suggested.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAmit Arora, Andy SF Lam, Zahra Karami, Loc Giang Do and Mark Fort Harris-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.rights(c) 2014 Arora et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-111-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectPeriodontal Diseases-
dc.subjectDental Caries-
dc.subjectTooth Injuries-
dc.subjectFluorides-
dc.subjectCariostatic Agents-
dc.subjectPit and Fissure Sealants-
dc.subjectDiet-
dc.subjectDental Care-
dc.subjectDental Devices, Home Care-
dc.subjectToothbrushing-
dc.subjectParents-
dc.subjectComprehension-
dc.subjectHealth Education, Dental-
dc.subjectTooth Eruption-
dc.subjectReading-
dc.subjectPamphlets-
dc.subjectTeaching Materials-
dc.subjectChild-
dc.subjectChild, Preschool-
dc.subjectInfant-
dc.subjectOral Health-
dc.subjectEducational Status-
dc.subjectAustralia-
dc.subjectTerminology as Topic-
dc.subjectHealth Literacy-
dc.subjectToothpastes-
dc.titleHow readable are Australian paediatric oral health education materials?-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1472-6831-14-111-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1069861-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1033213-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidDo, L. [0000-0003-3684-9949]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Dentistry publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_87389.pdfPublished version621.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.