Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/88453
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Book chapter
Title: Absorptive capacity: how organisations assimilate and apply knowledge to improve performance
Author: Harvey, G.
Jas, P.
Walshe, K.
Skelcher, C.
Citation: Connecting knowledge and performance in public services: from knowing to doing, 2010 / Walshe, K., Harvey, G., Jas, P. (ed./s), Ch.11, pp.226-250
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Publisher Place: UK
Issue Date: 2010
ISBN: 9780521195461
Editor: Walshe, K.
Harvey, G.
Jas, P.
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Gill Harvey, Pauline Jas, Kieran Walshe and Chris Skelcher
Abstract: In this chapter, we will examine the concept of absorptive capacity – defined as an organisation's ability to access, assimilate and apply new knowledge – and its value and utility in understanding, explaining and predicting public service performance, particularly in relation to the process of managing improvement and turnaround in poorly performing organisations. We will draw on research that we have been undertaking on organisations in the public sector, examining how they respond to evidence that they are performing poorly and what part absorptive capacity plays in determining their response. Introduction Organisations in the public sector are subject to increased monitoring and management of their performance. Schools, hospitals, local authorities, police forces and other public service agencies are required to meet nationally set performance standards and targets and their performance is often publicly reported through league tables, performance indicators, and reports from inspectorates and regulators. While those organisations that are deemed to be high performing may be rewarded, for example, by way of greater freedoms, those whose performance is poor are expected to bring about substantial, and often rapid, improvements in performance. Organisations appear to react to evidence of poor performance in a range of both defensive and proactive ways, some challenging the measures against which they have been judged, others seeking ways to respond to the evidence and bring about the necessary improvements.
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511762000.012
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511762000.012
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Nursing publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.