Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/88731
Type: Conference paper
Title: Best practice: why mastitis treatment is not successful?
Author: Petrovski, K.R.
Eats, P.T.
Citation: Proceedings of the AVA Annual Conference, 2014, pp.F4.1.1-
Publisher: Australian Vetinary Association
Issue Date: 2014
Conference Name: AVA Annual Conference (25 May 2014 - 30 May 2014 : Perth)
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Kiro R Petrovski, Patricia T Eats
Abstract: Effective mastitis control programs rely on decreasing the risk of exposure to mastitis-causing organisms, MCOs, and elimination of existing infections. Cows affected by clinical and, or subclinical mastitis are an obvious source of cross-infection to herd mates, regardless of whether the pathogens were contagious or environmental in origin, . Therefore, minimising exposure of healthy cows during the shedding phase of infected cows can reduce the potential risk of new infection, and is one avenue of approaching mastitis control. Shortening or cessation of the shedding phase can be achieved by different means, including temporary or permanent removal of the infected cow, s from residence within the, healthy, herd, pre-term drying off, extending the dry phase, and lactational or dry cow treatment. Mastitis treatment and its failure, with an emphasis on antimicrobial therapy, are the main focus of this paper. Pharmacokinetic properties of the product formulation used for mastitis treatment are not discussed.
Rights: © Authors
Published version: http://www.sciquest.org.nz/node/99885
Appears in Collections:Animal and Veterinary Sciences publications
Aurora harvest 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_88731.pdfPublished version1.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.