Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/90548
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: A randomized, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lumiliximab in combination with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab versus fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab alone in subjects with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia
Author: Awan, F.
Hillmen, P.
Hellmann, A.
Robak, T.
Hughes, S.
Trone, D.
Shannon, M.
Flinn, I.
Byrd, J.
Riveros, D.
Pavlovsky, S.
Iastrebner, C.
Carney, D.
Deveridge, S.
Durrant, S.
Hahn, U.
Hertzberg, M.
Leahy, M.
Ma, D.
Marlton, P.
et al.
Citation: British Journal of Haematology, 2014; 167(4):466-477
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons
Issue Date: 2014
ISSN: 0007-1048
1365-2141
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Farrukh T. Awan, Peter Hillmen, Andrzej Hellmann, Tadeusz Robak, Steven G. Hughes, Denise Trone, Megan Shannon, Ian W. Flinn, John C. Byrd and on behalf of the LUCID trial investigators
Abstract: Lumiliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that targets CD23 on the surface of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) B-cells. Early phase clinical studies with lumiliximab alone and in combination with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) established its potential efficacy and tolerability. The 152CL201 trial [Lumiliximab with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) versus FCR alone in subjects with relapsed CLL; LUCID] was a phase 2/3, randomized (1:1), open-label, multicentre study of lumiliximab in combination with FCR versus FCR alone in patients with relapsed CLL. Six hundred and twenty-seven patients were randomized to either arm. Overall the combination of lumiliximab with FCR was not significantly better than FCR alone (overall response rate 71% vs. 72%, complete response rate 16% vs. 15%, median progression-free survival 24.6 vs. 23.9 months respectively, for FCR with and without lumiliximab). There was a slightly increased incidence of adverse events with lumiliximab but these increases did not appear to lead to differences in eventual outcomes. An interim analysis failed to show sufficient efficacy of the combination of lumiliximab with FCR. The study was therefore stopped early for lack of efficacy. Despite the eventual outcome, the LUCID trial is one of the largest studies that provides valuable insight into the efficacy and tolerability of FCR as a therapeutic option for patients with relapsed CLL.
Keywords: CD23; chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; small lymphocytic lymphoma; lumiliximab
Rights: © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
RMID: 0030026865
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13061
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.