Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/90997
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArentz, G.-
dc.contributor.authorWeiland, F.-
dc.contributor.authorOehler, M.-
dc.contributor.authorHoffmann, P.-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationProteomics: Clinical Applications, 2015; 9(3-4):277-288-
dc.identifier.issn1862-8346-
dc.identifier.issn1862-8354-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/90997-
dc.description.abstractDifference gel electrophoresis enables the accurate quantification of changes in the proteome including combinations of PTMs and protein isoform expression. Here, we review recent advances in study design, image acquisition, and statistical analysis. We also compare DIGE to established and emerging mass spectrometric analysis technologies. Despite these recent advances in MS and the still unsolved limitations of 2DE to map hydrophobic, high molecular weight proteins with extreme pIs, DIGE remains the most comprehensive top-down method to study changes in abundance of intact proteins.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityGeorgia Arentz, Florian Weiland, Martin K. Oehler, and Peter Hoffmann-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWiley-VCH Verlag-
dc.rights© 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prca.201400119-
dc.subject2DE-
dc.subjectDIGE-
dc.subjectGel electrophoresis-
dc.subjectMS-
dc.titleState of the art of 2D DIGE-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/prca.201400119-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidWeiland, F. [0000-0001-9702-9245]-
dc.identifier.orcidOehler, M. [0000-0002-2651-5913]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 2
Molecular and Biomedical Science publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.