Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJamieson, L.-
dc.contributor.authorParker, E.-
dc.contributor.authorRoberts-Thomson, K.-
dc.contributor.authorLawrence, H.-
dc.contributor.authorBroughton, J.-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Oral Health, 2014; 14(1):29-1-29-7-
dc.descriptionPublished: 2 April 2014-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Self-efficacy plays an important role in oral health-related behaviours. There is little known about associations between self-efficacy and subjective oral health among populations at heightened risk of dental disease. This study aimed to determine if low self-efficacy was associated with poor self-rated oral health after adjusting for confounding among a convenience sample of pregnant women. METHODS: We used self-reported data from 446 Australian women pregnant with an Aboriginal child (age range 14-43 years) to evaluate self-rated oral health, self-efficacy and socio-demographic, psychosocial, social cognitive and risk factors. Hierarchical entry of explanatory variables into logistic regression models estimated prevalence odds ratios (POR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for fair or poor self-rated oral health. RESULTS: In an unadjusted model, those with low self-efficacy had 2.40 times the odds of rating their oral health as 'fair' or 'poor' (95% CI 1.54-3.74). Addition of socio-demographic factors attenuated the effect of low self-efficacy on poor self-rated oral health by 10 percent (POR 2.19, 95% CI 1.37-3.51). Addition of the psychosocial factors attenuated the odds by 17 percent (POR 2.07, 95% CI 1.28-3.36), while addition of the social cognitive variable fatalism increased the odds by 1 percent (POR 2.42, 95% CI 1.55-3.78). Inclusion of the behavioural risk factor 'not brushing previous day' attenuated the odds by 15 percent (POR 2.11, 95%CI 1.32-3.36). In the final model, which included all covariates, the odds were attenuated by 32 percent (POR 1.80, 95% CI 1.05, 3.08). CONCLUSIONS: Low self-efficacy persisted as a risk indicator for poor self-rated oral health after adjusting for confounding among this vulnerable population.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityLisa M Jamieson, Eleanor J Parker, Kaye F Roberts-Thomson, Herenia P Lawrence and John Broughton-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.rights© 2014 Jamieson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.-
dc.subjectRisk Factors-
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studies-
dc.subjectAttitude to Health-
dc.subjectStress, Psychological-
dc.subjectHealth Behavior-
dc.subjectSocial Desirability-
dc.subjectSelf Concept-
dc.subjectSelf Efficacy-
dc.subjectInternal-External Control-
dc.subjectAge Factors-
dc.subjectHealth Status-
dc.subjectQuality of Life-
dc.subjectSocial Class-
dc.subjectSocial Support-
dc.subjectOceanic Ancestry Group-
dc.subjectVulnerable Populations-
dc.subjectPregnant Women-
dc.subjectOral Health-
dc.subjectEducational Status-
dc.subjectSouth Australia-
dc.subjectYoung Adult-
dc.subjectSelf Report-
dc.titleSelf-efficacy and self-rated oral health among pregnant aboriginal Australian women-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.orcidJamieson, L. [0000-0001-9839-9280]-
dc.identifier.orcidParker, E. [0000-0002-6709-5476]-
dc.identifier.orcidRoberts-Thomson, K. [0000-0001-7084-5541]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 2
Dentistry publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_92838.pdfPublished version279.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.