1. Adelaide Research & Scholarship
  2. Schools and Disciplines
  3. School of Medical Sciences
  4. Medical Sciences publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/95108
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrown, M.-
dc.contributor.authorRuberu, R.-
dc.contributor.authorThompson, C.H.-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationInternal Medicine Journal, 2014; 44(1):93-96-
dc.identifier.issn1444-0903-
dc.identifier.issn1445-5994-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/95108-
dc.description.abstractThis research examined the quality of resuscitation decisions documented in the clinical notes of 99 older patients within 48 h of admission. Only 34 had current documentation that was frequently inconsistent and ambiguous, leaving patients at risk of receiving inappropriate and unwanted resuscitation. Clear guidelines with community input to guide the implementation and documentation of end-of-life decisions are essential.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityM. Brown, R. Ruberu, and C. H. Thompson-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWileyL-
dc.rights© 2014 The Authors-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.12328-
dc.subjectTerminal care; resuscitation order; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; advance care directive; aged care.-
dc.titleInadequate resuscitation documentation in older patients' clinical case notes-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/imj.12328-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidBrown, M. [0000-0001-8127-8669] [0000-0001-9509-6671]-
dc.identifier.orcidThompson, C.H. [0000-0002-5164-3327]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Medical Sciences publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.