Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/96702
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, B.-
dc.contributor.authorCasson, R.-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationAsia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology, 2012; 1(3):170-174-
dc.identifier.issn2162-0989-
dc.identifier.issn2162-0989-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/96702-
dc.description.abstractCommonly used anesthetic techniques for cataract surgery include peribulbar and sub-Tenon anesthesia. This evidence-based review compares these techniques, with a particular focus on patient comfort, akinesia, and anesthetic complications. A systematic search of the literature revealed that there is a paucity of robust evidence comparing sub-Tenon and peribulbar anesthesia. Based on the best available evidence, there is no significant difference in the efficacy of peribulbar compared with sub-Tenon anesthesia for cataract surgery; however, the potential complications of peribulbar anesthesia are more serious.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityBob Z. Wang and Robert Casson-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkins-
dc.rights© 2012 Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/apo.0b013e31825215e2-
dc.subjectcataract-
dc.subjectperibulbar-
dc.subjectsub-Tenon-
dc.subjectanesthesia-
dc.titleSystematic review of peribulbar anesthesia versus sub-Tenon anesthesia for cataract surgery-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/apo.0b013e31825215e2-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidCasson, R. [0000-0003-2822-4076]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Opthalmology & Visual Sciences publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.