Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
Type: Journal article
Title: How valid are self-reported height and weight? A comparison between CATI self-report and clinic measurements using a large cohort study
Author: Taylor, A.
DalGrande, E.
Gill, T.
Chittleborough, C.
Wilson, D.
Adams, R.
Grant, J.
Phillips, P.
Appleton, S.
Ruffin, R.
Citation: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2006; 30(3):238-246
Publisher: Public Health Assoc Australia Inc
Issue Date: 2006
ISSN: 1326-0200
Statement of
Anne W. Taylor, Eleonora Dal Grande, Tiffany K. Gill, Catherine R. Chittleborough, David H. Wilson, Robert J. Adams, Janet F. Grant, Patrick Phillips, Sarah Appleton and Richard E. Ruffin
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between self-reported and clinical measurements for height and weight in adults aged 18 years and over and to determine the bias associated with using household telephone surveys. METHOD: A representative population sample of adults aged 18 years and over living in the north-west region of Adelaide (n=1,537) were recruited to the biomedical cohort study in 2002/03. A computerassisted telephone interviewing (CATI) system was used to collect self-reported height and weight. Clinical measures were obtained when the cohort study participants attended a clinic for biomedical tests. RESULT: Adults over-estimated their height (by 1.4 cm) and under-estimated their weight (by 1.7 kg). Using the self-report figures the prevalence of overweight/ obese was 56.0% but this prevalence estimate increased to 65.3% when clinical measurements were used. The discrepancy in self-reported height and weight is partly explained by 1) a rounding effect (rounding height and weight to the nearest 0 or 5) and 2) older persons (65+ years) considerably over-estimating their height. CONCLUSION: Self-report is important in monitoring overweight and obesity; however, it must be recognised that prevalence estimates obtained are likely to understate the problem. Implications: The public health focus on obesity is warranted, but self-report estimates, commonly used to highlight the obesity epidemic, are likely to be underestimations. Self-report would be a more reliable measure if people did not round their measurements and if older persons more accurately knew their height.
Keywords: Humans
Body Weight
Body Mass Index
Body Height
Self Care
Health Care Surveys
Sensitivity and Specificity
Cohort Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Age Factors
Sex Factors
Socioeconomic Factors
Middle Aged
Description: The definitive version is available at
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2006.tb00864.x
Published version:
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 6
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.